Kolpakidi Alexander Biography Nationality

He, together with I., the main idea of ​​the topic “Two worlds - two Shapiro”: a division of Jews on Soviet and anti -Soviets, on Marxists and Trotskyists. It turns out that among the Jews there are more Russophobes than Russophiles, but before it was the other way around. At the same time, the Marxist struggle with Great Russian chauvinism in the USSR is somehow not taken into account. The topic that the gentlemen I.

Shishkin and A. Kolpakidi touched on, as they can accuse of inciting national hatred. However, if you think about it, this question is much deeper. After all, even the Nazis cannot be accused of hatred of the Jews, since there is not an emotion, but an idea regarding the chosenness of peoples, superiority. It is known that in the consciousness of the Jews that appeared in their families, since ancient times, the idea was laid down that they are chosen by the God - a people who should be over the peoples.

The Nazis used the idea of ​​the superiority of the Aryans over the rest of the peoples. Therefore, in ideologies it is necessary to look for the reason for the genocide of the Jewish people, and not in hatred, phobia. In general, in this matter, it is necessary to move from psychology to ideology, Marxist, in particular, led to the genocide of the class of the bourgeoisie.

The founder of Marxism is the famous thinker, moreover, a Jew, Karl Marx. This gives an occasion to the Jewish people to be proud of them. It is no secret that every nation honors their heroes and is proud of them. Actually, this is necessary for educational purposes. Heroes and saints are necessary as standards of socialization. Therefore, there are a lot of myths near them. Marxism is an ideology, a system of ideas, among which there is an idea that communism should come all over the world, that is, globally.

Therefore, this is globalism. However, communism will not come immediately all over the world, but by starting with the "weak link" the chain of capitalist countries. Some disabilities of this Marxist thought allowed another revolutionary of Jewish origin to Leo Trotsky to propose the concept of the “permanent revolution” as you know, the revolutionary of Georgian origin of Joseph Stalin ruined the idea of ​​Marxist-Trotskyist globalism.

He said that in the construction of communism, one can limit himself to one country, that is, Russia. And this was for the so -called 37 year.

Trotskyism uprooted in the USSR, as it were, for some revisionist social democratic ideas. But Trotskyism is preserved in abroad. In the 21st century, he showed up as the “neotrotskyism of the neocons” in the United States. This is, so to speak, by the way, since we are interested in the fate of Russia. Fate is what does not depend on the subject, the objective side of its history.

People write history. And so they wrote about the Norman history of the emergence of the Russian state, not a people. In this story, foreigners began to reign in Kievan Rus. And since then, as it were, the Russian people were ruled by foreigners. In general, when the Marxist revolutionaries, for the most part, they decided to implement the project of state communism of Marx, they took advantage of the Norman idea, choosing tsarist Russia as a bridgehead.

The proof is the fact that in the Soviet magazine “Spark” at the beginning of the X was a picture of the first revolutionary government of Soviet Russia with a list of personnel, among which there was not a single Russian person. Lenin was also a maternal Jew. This fact does not need to be inflated from nationalist positions. What happened happened. Many states arose and disappeared in history, sometimes together with the people.

Damn the example of this. It is good that this time the Russian people managed to survive, despite the struggle of internationalism with Great Russian chauvinism. Nations in the USSR were aligned by redistribution of finances in favor of the Union republics. In parallel, they riveted Soviet people, forgetting that traditional education was observed in national families.

This was remembered only in our liberal time of individualism, and took up arms against the traditional heterosexual family. Passing historical parallels and analogies, believing that history, in general, goes in a circle, or in a spiral, observing the dialectical law of denial, you should focus on this. After the counter -revolution of GG. The financial oligarchs, by nationality, Jews, along with finances, seized power and began, as B.

Yeltsin said, "quarrels with the president." This is: 1. Mikhail Khodorkovsky-Rosprom Group Menatep 3. Mikhail Friedman-Alfa Group 5. Vladimir Gusinsky - group "Most" 6. Vladimir Potanin - Oneximbank. Among the newly -minted elite of Russia was V. oligarch O. Deripaska, Belorus by nationality said that this is "our man." Ours, which means our own. I. Stalin, who abandoned the “fire of the world revolution”, was his own among the revolutionaries, from Trotskyism, and even evading orthodox Marxism, who said that “we need a theory without a theory of death”.

In essence, Stalin expressed the idea that Marxism with the project of state communism could not be realized by these words before his death. Andropov said: "We do not know the society in which we live." He did not recognize in him the communism of Marx. The anti -Soviet camp replenished its ranks.The Stalinist USSR, as a monument, must be destroyed by the ugly Marxism.

And they began to destroy him from the inside. He headed this process of the "crypto Jew" by Yu. What was next to everyone now knows. The main thing is that the President of the Russian Federation V. Putin began to compare with I. One, as it were, tore off the plans of the Marxists-Globalists and perverted the Martian model of the Communism, the second, as it were, tore off the plans of the liberals-globalists and perverted the model of Western liberalism.

But is it so? Maybe the role of these personalities in the history of Russia is not so great. It's just that the delusional ideas of reformers are one thing, life itself is another matter.